Skip to main content

State v. Higgins

Citations

  • 729 S.W.2d 288
  • 1987 WL 5329
  • 1987 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 2090

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that although the post-conviction court’s written order did not reflect findings of fact and conclusions of law for each ground for relief, the court “orally pronounced” its findings and conclusions from the bench, “rendering the error harmless”
  • It has long been recognized in the post- conviction arena that a trial court’s failure to reduce its findings of fact and conclusions of law to writing as statutorily required may be harmless error if the trial court orally pronounces its findings from the bench

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lloyd Tatum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.