State v. Higby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court erred by identifying section 812.155(4)(b) as mandatory presumption when it is permissive inference
• after reversing the dismissal of criminal charges on a facial constitutional challenge, noting that any as-applied challenge would depend on the particular facts developed below

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. Mendez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-07-25· cited 9×
• State v. Green
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-01

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Brake
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-09-20· cited 38×
• State v. Rygwelski
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-22· cited 15×