State v. Hicks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• without certification from habeas counsel that a pro se filing is sufficient and no further elaboration required, courts \must presume that counsel did not make a meaningful effort to comply\ with the rules for postconviction relief counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Quixal
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2013-07-17· cited 10×
• Mundy v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2018-01-19

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• State v. Fritz
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-01-14· cited 1,823×
• State v. Rue
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2002-12-12· cited 86×
• State v. Webster
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2006-07-12· cited 69×
• State v. Velez
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-03-13· cited 20×