Court of Appeals of Arizona· 6/20/1985
State v. Hicks
Citations
- 707 P.2d 331
- 146 Ariz. 533
- 1985 Ariz. App. LEXIS 635
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating officers entering home for exigent circumstances may only seize items in plain view
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Livermore, Hathaway, Lacagnina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court· 1987-03-03· cited 1,525×
- United States v. Kevin C. ReillySecond Circuit· 1996-02-12· cited 187×
- State v. HalczyszakOhio Supreme Court· 1986-08-13· cited 137×
- United States v. GaniasSecond Circuit· 2016-05-27· cited 79×
- United States v. Samad HaqqSecond Circuit· 2002-01-17· cited 34×
- State v. ReasonerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-05-12· cited 24×
- State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-09-05· cited 11×
- United States v. VillardD. New Jersey· 1988-02-11· cited 10×
- State v. BritainCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-02-23· cited 7×
- United States v. Kevin McClain George Brandt Jason DavisSixth Circuit· 2006-03-31· cited 3×
- United States v. McClainSixth Circuit· 2006-03-31
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.