Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 10/27/1992

State v. Hickman

Citations

491 N.W.2d 673
1992 Minn. App. LEXIS 1052
1992 WL 303173

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

suppressing evidence obtained after original suspicion was dispelled and when no articulable suspicion of revoked license existed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schumacher, Parker, Davies

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Chism
Court of Appeals of Utah· 2005-02-03· cited 18×
State v. Shellito
Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-04-13· cited 11×
State v. Lopez
Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-07-17· cited 11×
State v. Cox
Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2011-11-28· cited 5×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Terry v. Ohio
Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
Delaware v. Prouse
Supreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
State v. Othoudt
Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-03-13· cited 183×
Marben v. State, Department of Public Safety
Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-05-23· cited 123×
State v. McKinley
Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-09-05· cited 71×
State v. Engholm
Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-03-28· cited 58×
State v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-07-22· cited 41×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.