Skip to main content
· 12/6/1996

State v. Hickles

Citations

  • 929 P.2d 141
  • 261 Kan. 74
  • 1996 Kan. LEXIS 163

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • permitting over 100 photographs to be shown to the jury because, \Cumulative evidence in itself is not objectionable. Error cannot be predicated on allowing the use of such evidence.\
  • photographs used to prove the elements of the crime, including the fact and manner of death and the violent nature of the crime, are relevant and admissible
  • “Cumulative evidence in itself is not objectionable.”
  • \Cumulative evidence in itself is not objectionable.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett, Allegrucci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.