· 12/6/1996
State v. Hickles
Citations
- 929 P.2d 141
- 261 Kan. 74
- 1996 Kan. LEXIS 163
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- permitting over 100 photographs to be shown to the jury because, \Cumulative evidence in itself is not objectionable. Error cannot be predicated on allowing the use of such evidence.\
- photographs used to prove the elements of the crime, including the fact and manner of death and the violent nature of the crime, are relevant and admissible
- “Cumulative evidence in itself is not objectionable.”
- \Cumulative evidence in itself is not objectionable.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lockett, Allegrucci
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.