Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 7/18/2017

State v. Hester

Citations

803 S.E.2d 8
2017 WL 3027112
2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 558

Syllabus

denial of motion to dismiss- 4th Amendment commission of new crime after stop attenuation and intervening circumstance plain error review

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing “the exclusionary rule [is] applicable only where its deterrence benefits outweigh its substantial social costs” (alteration, citation, and quotation marks omitted)
recognizing “the exclusionary rule [is] applicable only where its deterrence benefits outweigh its substantial social costs” (alteration, citation, and quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tyson, Dillon, McGee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.