Skip to main content

State v. Herrera

Citations

  • 522 P.2d 76
  • 86 N.M. 224

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that when a legislative body’s perceived legislative intent fails to coincide with a statute’s wording, it is the perceived intent, and not the statute’s literal language, that we must vindicate
  • stating that in construing a statute we consider the object of the statute
  • “We will not construe statutes to achieve an absurd result or to defeat the intended object of the legislature.”
  • statute construed based on perceived legislative object and purpose, rather than on literal language
  • \We will not construe statutes to achieve an absurd result or to defeat the intended object of the [L]egislature.\
  • “We will not construe statutes to achieve an absurd result or to defeat the intended object of the [L]egislature.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stephenson, McManus, Oman, Montoya, Martinez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.