State v. Heritage Realty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• analyzing claim under Vermont antitrust law exclusively by reference to federal court Sherman Act decisions
• explaining that “[a]n agreement among competitors to fix prices” violates VCPA
• hearing on motion for summary judgment solely to determine whether a genuine issue exists as to any material fact
• state=s evidence insufficient to show anything more than similar prices reached independently which would not support the agreement elemental to an illegal price-fixing conspiracy, but summary judgment was premature in light of State=s petition for additional discovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).