State v. Herber

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the provisions of Rule 31.20 authorize the suspension of the time requirements for the filing of motions for rehearing and petitions for review in regular criminal appeals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Pope
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-10-06· cited 26×
• State v. Rodriguez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-12-14· cited 3×
• State v. Pope
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-05-20· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Francisco v. State
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-09-28· cited 36×
• Cauley v. Industrial Commission
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1971-06-23· cited 5×
• State v. Carr
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-03-06· cited 2×