State v. Hentze

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the barge moved only four times during the relevant period of time
• noting that the barge moved only four times during the relevant period of time
• finding that plaintiff had raised disputed issues of material fact as to whether he qualified for seaman status under the Jones Act even though he was hired as a carpenter, and “[h]is actual duties included mechanical work, welding, carpentry, supply runs, and occasionally pile driving”
• “District courts have broad discretion in interpreting and applying their local rules.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).