Skip to main content

State v. Henson

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 3137

Syllabus

Zmuda, J., writing for the majority, affirms the trial court's judgment denying leave to file a motion for new trial based on the lack of clear and convincing proof that Henson was unavoidably prevented from filing the motion within the time provided under Crim.R. 33(B). As leave was denied, the trial court never properly reached the merits of Henson's motion for new trial and no review of the merits is necessary on appeal.

Judges: Zmuda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.