State v. Hensley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]here two defendants signed a contract as individuals, 22 not as agents, and where their names were included within the identification of one of the 23 parties to the contract, the question of their intent to be personally bound was for the trier 24 of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hensley
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-11-24· cited 4×
• State v. Hensley
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1993-06-23· cited 2×
• Hensley v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-04-07· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Grady v. Corbin
  Supreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 1,620×
• Garcia v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-01-30· cited 8×