Skip to main content

State v. Hensel

Citations

  • 901 N.W.2d 166
  • 2017 Minn. LEXIS 582
  • 2017 WL 4052301

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing how a “shave-a-little-off-here” statute “may well be more sensible, but ... it bears little resemblance to the statute that the Legislature actually passed”
  • listing fighting words and true threats as categories of unprotected speech
  • \[W]e have long held that it is impermissible to add words or phrases to an unambiguous statute.\ (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • \[I]t is impermissible to add words or phrases to an unambiguous statute.\ (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Consideration, Gildea, Lillehaug, Stras, Took

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.