State v. Henneberry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a blood sample taken by medical personal for diagnostic and treatment purposes only and not as authorized under the statutory implied-consent provision was inadmissible under the physician-patient privilege
• “The creation of an exception to the statutory privilege is solely within the province of the legislature, and not the judiciary.”
• communications include “all knowledge and information gained by the physician in the observation and personal examination of the patient in the discharge of his duties”
• “Three elements must be established in order for the privilege to be applicable: (1) the relationship of doctor-patient; (2) the acquisition of the information or knowledge during this relationship; and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).