State v. Henley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing a similar process followed on remand from the Supreme Court’s deter- mination that testimony about grooming constituted scien- tific evidence that required a foundational showing under OEC 702
• describing a similar process followed on remand from the Supreme Court’s deter- mination that testimony about grooming constituted scien- tific evidence that required a foundational showing under OEC 702

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hall
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-12-18· cited 10×
• State v. Etzel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-04-21· cited 4×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-09-08· cited 1×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-02-19

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
• State v. Brown
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-07-10· cited 292×
• State v. O'Key
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-07-07· cited 243×
• State v. Southard
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-10-01· cited 141×
• State v. Perry
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-10-01· cited 44×
• State v. Henley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2018-07-19· cited 43×
• Marcum v. Adventist Health System/West
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-09-16· cited 31×
• State v. Prieto-Rubio
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-04-07· cited 31×
• State v. Branch
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-06-01· cited 17×
• Thoens v. Safeco Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-07-22· cited 11×
• State v. Swinney
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-11· cited 10×
• State v. Michael P. Martin
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2016-02-12· cited 6×
• State v. Prieto-Rubio
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-02· cited 6×
• State v. Etzel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-04-21· cited 4×
• State v. Henley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-10-26· cited 3×