State v. Henderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• There must be satisfactory proof of the credibility of every person involved in the chain of information from the initial observer to the affiant.
• information “has proven to be accurate and reliable each time”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Prince
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-09-14· cited 34×
• State v. Mellinger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-05-04· cited 21×
• State v. Harp
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-09-08· cited 20×
• State v. Milks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-04-20· cited 15×
• State v. Fink
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-06-04· cited 14×
• State v. Hasselback
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-12-30· cited 10×
• State v. Koppenhafer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-09-15· cited 6×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-04-20· cited 4×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-07-21· cited 3×
• State v. Fincher
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1982-02-23· cited 3×
• State v. Alvarez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-11-02· cited 2×
• State v. Coffey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-11-23· cited 2×
• State v. Kreutzer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-12-20· cited 2×