State v. Helland
Citations
- 2025 ND 63
Syllabus
A district court has inherent power to take judicial notice in a preliminary proceeding where the rules of evidence do not apply, provided certain standards are met. The requirement in N.D.C.C. § 62.1-02-01(1)(b) that the predicate misdemeanor offense be \committed while using or possessing a firearm\ does not require the use or possession of a firearm be an element of the predicate offense. Moreover, the requirement in section 62.1-02-01(1)(b) that the predicate misdemeanor offense be \committed while using or possessing a firearm\ does not require the use or possession of the firearm in committing the predicate offense be proven or admitted to in the predicate criminal action. 0n a prosecution under N.D.C.C. § 62.1-02-01(1)(b), the State has the burden to prove the defendant used or possessed a firearm when the defendant committed the predicate offense. Under N.D.C.C. § 62.1-02-01(2)(b), a \conviction\ includes a deferred imposition of sentence. A deferred imposition of sentence no longer exists when the court sets aside the verdict of guilty and dismisses the information. Section 62.1-02-01(2)(b) refers to a conviction for a deferred imposition of sentence that has not been dismissed.
Judges: Bahr, Douglas Alan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Emerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-04-13· cited 407×
- United States v. HayesSupreme Court· 2009-02-24· cited 322×
- Mattes v. ABC Plastics, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 2003-02-24· cited 279×
- State v. BluntNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-06-30· cited 28×
- State v. CainNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-11-15· cited 28×
- Gnecchi v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1961-08-17· cited 26×
- Matter of Estates of KjorvestadNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-04-03· cited 25×
- State v. EbertzNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-05-11· cited 24×
- Orwig v. OrwigNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-02-18· cited 24×
- State v. BecirajNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2003-11-13· cited 21×
- Tkach v. American Sportsman, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-03-11· cited 21×
- Eagan Economic Development Authority v. U-Haul Co. of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-07-29· cited 20×
- Hadland v. SchroederNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-11-24· cited 13×
- Patten v. GreenNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-12-16· cited 13×
- Kroschel v. LeviNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-07-07· cited 12×
- Great Plains Royalty Corp. v. Earl Schwartz Co.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-04-05· cited 12×
- Kalvoda v. Bismarck Public School District 1North Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-02-08· cited 12×
- State v. RohrichNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-01-25· cited 10×
- State v. CraigNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-05-16· cited 9×
- Eubanks v. FisketjonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-07-08· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.