Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/8/2021

State v. Heineman

Citations

2021 Ohio 643

Syllabus

Body camera footage was properly authenticated. Trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to admission of the body camera footage when it had been properly authenticated. The trial court did not err in permitting the State to present more body camera footage as part of the rebuttal. The conviction was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Judges: Willamowski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

State v. Beatty
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-03-04· cited 1×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Thompkins
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
Lockhart v. Fretwell
Supreme Court· 1993-01-25· cited 3,956×
State v. Calhoun
Ohio Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 1,479×
State v. Lytle
Ohio Supreme Court· 1976-12-27· cited 1,190×
State v. Conway
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-06-21· cited 704×
State v. Hester
Ohio Supreme Court· 1976-02-04· cited 344×
State v. Montgomery (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-08-24· cited 291×
United States v. Moriani
Supreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 279×
Peters v. Ohio State Lottery Commission
Ohio Supreme Court· 1992-03-25· cited 150×
State v. Walker
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-20· cited 73×
State v. Moorer
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-02-25· cited 20×
Davis v. Butler Cty. Bd. of Revision
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-07-29· cited 4×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.