State v. Heiller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that testimony from agents that they did not look beyond information in the computerized information system and did not consult underlying documents supported a finding that the furnisher acted unreasonably in failing to verify the accuracy of disputed information
• noting that confining the investigation to internal computer notes was not necessarily reasonable in light of the specificity of the description of the dispute in the notice
• endorsing “the general balancing test ... weighing the cost of verifying disputed information against the possible harm to the consumer”
• affirming jury verdict in consumer suit for violation of § 1681s-2(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).