· 4/15/1890
State v. Heidenhain
Citations
- 42 La. 483
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where, as here, the claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress is ‘wholly derivative from the alleged conduct giving rise to [his] Title VII’ and Rehabilitation Act claims, the tort claim has been preempted.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McBnery
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.