Skip to main content
· 4/15/1890

State v. Heidenhain

Citations

  • 42 La. 483

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Where, as here, the claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress is ‘wholly derivative from the alleged conduct giving rise to [his] Title VII’ and Rehabilitation Act claims, the tort claim has been preempted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McBnery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.