State v. Heidebrink

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Defendant contends that there was insufficient evidence to corroborate the testimony of the accomplice. . . . We agree with the State that defendant has failed to preserve error on these issues 4 by not challenging the sufficiency of the evidence at trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).