State v. Heald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the descriptions given by three witnesses were sufficiently accurate, despite the fact that they varied in detail
• State’s evidence that defendant had been sentenced on seven occasions to incarceration for a period greater than one year met the requirements of RSA 651:6,1(c)
• photographic array held unduly suggestive where component pictures were consistent with one another except for defendant’s picture which alone corresponded to particulars of the eyewitnesses’ description
• out-of-court identification admitted where defendant identified within two-and-one-half days of crime
• past criminal record may be a factor in determining sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cyr
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1982-12-30· cited 30×
• Heald v. Perrin
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-07-13· cited 24×
• State v. Kiewert
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-03-20· cited 24×
• State v. Perron
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1982-11-05· cited 22×
• State v. Levey
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1982-04-27· cited 19×
• State v. LaRose
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-08-15· cited 19×
• State v. Hammell
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-12-21· cited 15×
• State v. Preston
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1982-03-05· cited 10×
• State v. Humphrey
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1987-08-17· cited 6×
• State v. Gonzales
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1980-12-17· cited 5×
• State v. Whittey
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1991-06-07· cited 4×