Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 12/29/1978
State v. Heald
Citations
- 395 A.2d 457
- 1978 Me. LEXIS 765
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKusick, Wer-Nick, Archibald, Delahanty, Godfrey, Pomeroy, Nichols
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PierceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1981-12-11· cited 59×
- State v. EstesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1980-08-27· cited 48×
- State v. MortonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1979-01-29· cited 18×
- State of Maine v. Jason TwardusSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2013-08-06· cited 17×
- State v. GatcombSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-08-01· cited 11×
- State v. ArnoldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1981-08-24· cited 9×
- State v. HardingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1979-12-03· cited 9×
- State v. CollinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1980-07-16· cited 4×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.