Skip to main content

State v. Haynie

Citations

  • 867 P.2d 416
  • 116 N.M. 746

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an appellate court has the authority to 13 remand for entry of judgment and resentencing when evidence supports a lesser- 14 included offense
  • concluding that the “interests of justice” are not better served by remanding the case for a new trial when the record supports conviction on the lesser included offense beyond a reasonable doubt
  • reversing first-degree conviction and remanding for judgment on lesser included second-degree conviction based on evidence that each murder was separate and distinct
  • discussing the authority of an appellate court to remand for entry of judgment when evidence supports conviction on the lesser included offense
  • stating appellate court has authority to remand for entry of judgment and resentencing when evidence does not support offense for which a defendant was convicted, but does support a lesser included offense, and the interests of justice would not be served by allowing a new trial
  • all expressing majority view and listing cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ransom, Montgomery, Franchini

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.