State v. Haworth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Newly-discovered evidence which is impeaching is looked upon with equal distrust as cumulative evidence, and in no instance should a new trial be granted unless it clearly appears that the newly-discovered evidence would probably change the result on a retrial.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pinder v. State
  Utah Supreme Court· 2015-07-21· cited 17×
• State v. King
  Utah Supreme Court· 1903-10-22· cited 4×
• Monmouth Pottery Co. v. White
  Utah Supreme Court· 1904-02-09· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Arnold v. Skaggs
  California Supreme Court· 1868-07-01· cited 44×
• State v. Haworth
  Utah Supreme Court· 1902-03-17· cited 43×
• Hobler v. Cole
  California Supreme Court· 1874-07-01· cited 12×