Oregon Supreme Court· 7/25/1922
State v. Hawk
Citations
- 105 Or. 319
- 208 P. 709
- 1922 Ore. LEXIS 76
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The power of eminent domain is inherent in the state, yet it lies dormant until called into exercise by express legislative authority[.] * * * [Statutes providing for condemnation should be strictly construed.” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bean, Burnett, Harris, McCourt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. BurkOregon Supreme Court· 1954-01-13· cited 110×
- Foeller v. Housing Authority of PortlandOregon Supreme Court· 1953-04-29· cited 59×
- Tomasek v. Oregon State Highway CommissionOregon Supreme Court· 1952-09-24· cited 54×
- State Highway Commission v. KendrickOregon Supreme Court· 1961-07-19· cited 40×
- Moore Mill & Lumber Co. v. FosterOregon Supreme Court· 1959-02-25· cited 37×
- County of Freeborn v. BrysonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1973-08-31· cited 33×
- Smith v. CameronOregon Supreme Court· 1922-11-28· cited 32×
- State Highway Commission v. StumboOregon Supreme Court· 1960-05-25· cited 24×
- GTE Northwest Inc. v. Public Utility CommissionOregon Supreme Court· 1995-08-24· cited 19×
- Esso Standard Oil Company v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1957-11-12· cited 19×
- Thompson v. Tualatin Hills Park & Recreation DistrictD. Oregon· 1980-07-28· cited 15×
- State Highway Commission v. HooperOregon Supreme Court· 1971-09-10· cited 15×
- WITHERS v. ReedOregon Supreme Court· 1952-04-16· cited 12×
- Re Petition of ReederOregon Supreme Court· 1924-02-05· cited 12×
- Hayes v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court· 1923-10-09· cited 9×
- State Highway Commission v. Pacific Shore Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1954-04-14· cited 5×
- Town of Holliston v. Holliston Water Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1940-05-07· cited 5×
- Moody v. BensonOregon Supreme Court· 1923-11-27· cited 3×
- County Use of Liquid Fuels Tax FundPennsylvania Department of Justice· 1961-02-16
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Water Works Co. v. BurkhartIndiana Supreme Court· 1872-11-15· cited 73×
- Simmons v. WintersOregon Supreme Court· 1891-06-24· cited 66×
- Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1906-03-30· cited 48×
- South Park Commissioners v. DunlevyIllinois Supreme Court· 1878-09-15· cited 44×
- Bridal Veil Lumbering Co. v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court· 1896-11-09· cited 35×
- State v. MetschanOregon Supreme Court· 1896-11-09· cited 35×
- Schreiber v. Chicago & Evanston RailroadIllinois Supreme Court· 1885-11-14· cited 33×
- Oregon R. & N. Co. v. EastlackOregon Supreme Court· 1909-07-13· cited 31×
- Dallas v. HallockOregon Supreme Court· 1904-02-01· cited 26×
- Apex Transportation Co. v. GarbadeOregon Supreme Court· 1898-03-21· cited 23×
- Matter of Poughkeepsie Bridge CompanyNew York Court of Appeals· 1888-02-28· cited 22×
- State v. GanongOregon Supreme Court· 1919-09-16· cited 22×
- Crawford v. School District No. 7Oregon Supreme Court· 1913-12-30· cited 20×
- Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Fall Lake Boom Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1894-08-07· cited 18×
- King v. MillerOregon Supreme Court· 1908-10-06· cited 17×
- Warm Springs Irrigation Dist. v. Pacific Livestock Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1918-05-28· cited 15×
- Wormely v. Mason City & Fort Dodge Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1903-05-26· cited 15×
- Portland-Oregon City Ry. Co. v. PenneyOregon Supreme Court· 1916-06-27· cited 9×
- Oregon & California Railroad v. BarlowBaker County Circuit Court, Oregon· 1871-03-15· cited 9×
- Meyers v. Hot Lake Sanatorium Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1916-12-27· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.