New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1/12/2000
State v. Hawk
Citations
- 743 A.2d 325
- 327 N.J. Super. 276
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding the prosecutor's comments were A-3943-16T1 12 improper when he stated to the jury that by returning a guilty verdict the jury would send the message that \this community will not tolerate distributors and sellers of [drugs]\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges King and Paul G. Levy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2001-05-08· cited 192×
- Jackowitz v. LangNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2009-07-31· cited 44×
- State v. MoraisNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2003-04-01· cited 37×
- State v. John DiscolaSupreme Court of Vermont· 2018-01-19· cited 24×
- State v. AnastasiaNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2003-01-16· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.