State v. Havatone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the CDA “extends only to the procurement of services by the Government and not the provision of such services”
• “Intangible forms of consideration, such as bailment contracts, contracts for uranium enrichment services, and guarantees of government money orders, do not qualify as ‘procurements’ under the CDA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).