State v. Hastings

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the fact that investigation and the exercise of ordinary prudence would have disclosed the falsity of the pretenses is not important; what is important is whether the false pretenses in fact deceived the person defrauded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Fred G. Amick
  Seventh Circuit· 1971-03-29· cited 55×
• State v. Biby
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-04-17· cited 26×
• Fischer v. Knapp
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-04-04· cited 10×
• Minnesota v. Hoeven
  Eighth Circuit· 2006-08-03· cited 5×
• State v. Phillips
  Washington Supreme Court· 1953-02-27· cited 5×
• State v. York
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-11-17· cited 3×
• State of Minnesota v. John Hoeven
  Eighth Circuit· 2006-08-03· cited 1×
• Biby v. Satran
  D. North Dakota· 1985-10-22

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Stewart
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1900-10-17· cited 13×