State v. Haskins
Citations
- 2026 ND 23
Syllabus
Rule 11, N.D.R.Crim.P., does not require courts to specifically address a defendant's age, education, mental capacity, background, or experience during the plea colloquy. Courts have no duty under Rule 11 to inquire about or rule out potential affirmative defenses before accepting a guilty plea. A guilty plea generally waives all non-jurisdictional claims and defenses, including constitutional, procedural, and statutory defenses. Rule 11(b)(3) requires the court to determine a factual basis exists before entering judgment on a guilty plea. The factual basis must satisfy all elements of the charged crime and be sufficiently precise and specific on the record. Even when a Rule 11 violation constitutes obvious error, the defendant must demonstrate the error affected substantial rights. A sentence within the statutory range and the range contemplated in the plea agreement is generally not grossly disproportionate under Eighth Amendment analysis.
Judges: Bahr, Douglas Alan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 1,790×
- State v. OlanderNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-03-05· cited 137×
- People v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-02-19· cited 118×
- United States v. Cindy Gabbard Adams, A/K/A Cindy SanchezFifth Circuit· 1992-05-08· cited 104×
- United States v. HamiltonTenth Circuit· 2007-12-18· cited 99×
- State v. ErickstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-12-07· cited 66×
- United States v. Francis Alvin JohnsonFifth Circuit· 1977-02-11· cited 48×
- United States v. Joe S. LumpkinsSeventh Circuit· 1988-05-03· cited 45×
- United States v. Michael OrtizFifth Circuit· 2019-06-19· cited 40×
- State v. MagnusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-12-02· cited 38×
- State v. BlurtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-07-21· cited 37×
- State v. GunwallNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-10-03· cited 34×
- State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-07-20· cited 27×
- Froistad v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-03-18· cited 27×
- State v. HenesNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-04-02· cited 24×
- Time Warner Cable v. National Labor Relations BoardD.C. Circuit· 1998-11-06· cited 20×
- Bay v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2003-12-02· cited 20×
- State v. GlaserNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-02-12· cited 18×
- Eaton v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-02-08· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.