State v. Hashman
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 3853
Syllabus
Judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed. Trial Court did not commit error during defendant's plea colloquy when informing Hashman of the maximum sentence for each count and therefore substantially complied with the requirements under Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that it takes more than a federal element to establish arising under jurisdiction
- noting that even where federal law controls, the prudent course is often to adopt state law as the federal rule of decision, rather than to create federal common law
- concluding that a preemption defense is at least “plausible”
- noting that even where federal law controls, the prudent course is often to adopt state law as the federal rule of decision, rather than to create federal common law
- describing Grable as presenting a 12 nearly “pure issue of law”
- \The dispute [in Grable ] centered on the action of a federal agency (IRS) and its compatibility with a federal statute[.]\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boggs
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.