State v. Harvey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, under standard rules of construction, the plain meaning of the statute governs review
• holding that, where a defendant has been declared as a habitual traffic offender, he can be charged only under section 322.34(2)(a), Florida Statutes
• “Under the plain meaning of section 322.34(1) [now (2) ], persons who have been declared habitual traffic offenders are excluded from its application. In stead, section 322.34(2) [now (5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gil v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2013-07-11· cited 10×
• Belt v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-01-21· cited 6×
• Alphonso Finney v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-05-19· cited 3×
• Santiago v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-16· cited 2×
• Arino v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-01· cited 1×
• Guilford v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-30· cited 1×
• State v. Cineus
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-30
• State v. Stagnaro
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-30
• Garbe v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-30
• State v. Berry
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-30
• State v. Boyd
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-30
• State v. Knueppel
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-06-04
• Perryman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-11-19

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Capers v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-07-18· cited 40×