State v. Hartzog

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Section 924.07(1)(j) expressly authorizes the state to appeal from a ruling following a jury verdict. Obviously, if the words of a statute are unambiguous, judicial interpretation should not displace the clearly stated intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Wilen
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 1995-11-07· cited 23×
• State v. Phillips
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1999-07-14· cited 19×
• Phillips v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-12-13· cited 11×
• Bryan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-18· cited 10×
• Nicolosi v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-09· cited 10×
• Norton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-18· cited 9×
• J.A.S.R. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-02· cited 7×
• State v. Smith
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-06-02· cited 4×
• Burney v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-07-27· cited 3×
• SINQUEFIELD v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-01-30· cited 2×
• JASR v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-02
• STATE OF FLORIDA v. JAMAAL PICKERSGILL
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-10-30
• R.D. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-06-14

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• M.C. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-05-24· cited 18×
• Taylor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-03-11· cited 17×
• Kaiser v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-03-02· cited 11×