State v. Hartz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although the specific underlying felony is an essential element of' felony-murder, the government is not required to include the elements of the underlying felony or state the specific means by which it alleges the defendant committed the underlying felony
• “The holding in Kreck v. Spalding that an information that fails to elect an alternative means is constitutionally deficient is unpersuasive.”
• “[W]e hold that in charging [defendant] with felony murder, the State was not required to include the elements of the underlying felony or state the specific means of committing the felony on which it was relying.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).