Skip to main content
· 4/30/1990

State v. Hartsough

Citations

  • 790 P.2d 836
  • 14 Brief Times Rptr. 581
  • 1990 Colo. LEXIS 313
  • 1990 WL 52786

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the term \public hospital\ in another CGIA waiver provision, section 24-10-106(1)(b
  • noting that despite the general rule of broad construction in the CGIA context, it \remains true ... that our primary task in construing a statute is to determine and give effect to the intent of the legislature\
  • implicitly applying noscitur a sociis in the CGIA context and explaining that \the meaning of a doubtful word may be ascertained by reference to the meaning of words associated with it\
  • in addressing whether veterinary hospital was public hospital for purposes of GIA, court noted that “ordinary meaning of ‘hospital’ is a place where sick or injured persons, not animals, are treated.”
  • implicitly applying noscitur a sociis by noting that \the meaning of a doubtful word may be ascertained by reference to the meaning of words associated with it\
  • context in which words “public hospital” are used in GIA “strongly suggests that the section was intended to apply to public facilities designed to hold people”; hence, veterinary hospital not included within term

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lohr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.