State v. Hart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for a new trial where appellant could not make first appeal without transcripts which were unavailable by no fault of appellant
• twelve-year delay and death of trial judge made a new trial necessary, as a hearing to reconstruct the transcript would have been futile
• twelve-year delay and death of trial judge made a new trial necessary, as a hearing to reconstruct the transcript would have been futile
• United States Supreme Court does not mandate reversal every time transcript is lost through no fault of defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Miller
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1994-06-14· cited 53×
• Commonwealth v. Harris
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1978-07-24· cited 50×
• State Ex Rel. Kisner v. Fox
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1980-06-17· cited 14×
• State v. Perry
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1985-12-26· cited 7×
• State v. Sage
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1994-03-23· cited 5×
• Petrone Cabanas v. Hon. pineda/state
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-11-29· cited 5×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Britt v. North Carolina
  Supreme Court· 1971-12-13· cited 727×
• Mayer v. City of Chicago
  Supreme Court· 1971-12-13· cited 487×
• Norvell v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-27· cited 239×
• Solo Cup Co. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 28×
• State v. Masters
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1972-03-22· cited 22×
• Charles E. Hart v. Frank Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Prison, State of Arizona
  Ninth Circuit· 1972-06-12· cited 21×