State v. Hart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the court had the “inherent power to correct or conform an erroneous recording of [its] intended sentence”
• a sentencing court does have “inherent power to correct its records at any time ‘to show the true intent of the sentencing court at the time the original sentence was imposed.’ [Cits.]”
• an indeterminate sentence is void

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hart v. Hodges
  Eleventh Circuit· 2009-11-17· cited 115×
• Reynolds v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-03-09· cited 32×
• Kaiser v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-09-30· cited 8×
• Griggs v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-02-16· cited 7×
• H. ESTRADA
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 2016-07-01· cited 7×
• Hall v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-05-22· cited 2×
• Christopher Scott Borum v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-09-10
• Jason Wooten v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2022-02-07
• Jemelle Francis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2022-03-17
• State v. Cynthia Devine
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2024-10-23
• Mark Gray v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-08-26
• Davoric Tilman v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2023-08-24

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hopper v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1977-04-06· cited 16×
• Latham v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-02-17· cited 16×
• Taylor v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1981-01-22· cited 11×
• Johnson v. Gooding
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1979-01-04· cited 9×
• Bryant v. Evans
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1979-11-06· cited 5×