State v. Hart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a trial court may not preclude the state from offering admissible evidence because the defendant’s anticipated response would open the door to otherwise inadmissible evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Johnson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-04-19· cited 52×
• State v. Goree
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-12-17· cited 21×
• State v. Oakes
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2010-12-07· cited 20×
• State v. Harberts
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-02-19· cited 13×
• State v. Harberts
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-11-13· cited 5×
• State of Tennessee v. Quintis McCaleb
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2019-08-21

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Brown
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-07-10· cited 292×
• State v. Brewton
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1964-10-21· cited 91×
• State v. Green
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1975-01-30· cited 60×
• State v. Lyon
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-10-13· cited 53×
• State v. Hart
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-09-06· cited 4×