State v. Harrison
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 3817
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in failing to dismiss the criminal charges against appellant based on the State's failure to provide discovery. While the discovery response had been lost in the mail, appellant was given discovery the day of trial and refused the continuance the trial court offered. As a result, appellant waived any objections. The trial court also did not abuse its discretion by allowing a 35-minute delay of trial so that the State's witness could arrive. Finally, appellant failed to file a transcript of the magistrate's hearing in the trial court or on appeal and, in this circumstance, we are required to assume the regularity of the trial court proceedings. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court· 1980-02-13· cited 2,064×
- State v. UngerOhio Supreme Court· 1981-07-01· cited 1,145×
- State v. BroomOhio Supreme Court· 1988-12-30· cited 575×
- City of Lakewood v. PapadelisOhio Supreme Court· 1987-08-05· cited 330×
- State ex rel. Fuller v. MengelOhio Supreme Court· 2003-12-24· cited 143×
- State ex rel. Neil v. French (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-07-11· cited 101×
- State ex rel. Gessner v. VoreOhio Supreme Court· 2009-08-25· cited 54×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-07-18· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.