Skip to main content

State v. Harris

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 910

Syllabus

PLEAS — CRIM.R. 11 Where the trial court was not bound by the recommended sentence in the plea agreement and explained to defendant the difference in the potential sentence as opposed to what was stated on the plea form, the trial court did not err to defendant's prejudice in deviating from the recommended sentence in the plea agreement, especially where defendant ultimately was sentenced to the four years she had bargained for. Where the trial court explained the clerical error in the written plea form and confirmed defendant's understanding of the correct potential sentence, defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered the guilty plea.

Judges: Kinsley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.