Skip to main content

State v. Harris

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 2138

Syllabus

NO-CONTEST PLEA – INVITED ERROR – MOTION TO SUPPRESS – REASONABLE SUSPICION: While defendant's no-contest plea admitted to facts in the complaint and the state's explanation of circumstances that were insufficient to convict defendant for a violation of R.C. 2923.16(E)(1), defendant invited the error when he waived the explanation of circumstances and all defects at the plea hearing, thus barring defendant from challenging his conviction on appeal under the invited-error doctrine. The trial court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress the gun found on defendant because the officer's detention of defendant was supported by reasonable suspicion and the gun was spotted in plain view.

Judges: Bock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.