Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/10/2023

State v. Harris

Citations

2023 Ohio 729

Syllabus

Anders appeal. Appellate counsel filed an Anders brief concluding there are no arguably meritorious issues to present on appeal. Neither appellant nor his counsel raised any potential assignments of error having arguable merit for our review. After conducting an independent review of the proceedings, we agree that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. Judgments affirmed.

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Anders v. California
Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
Penson v. Ohio
Supreme Court· 1988-11-29· cited 13,912×
Boykin v. Alabama
Supreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
State v. Veney
Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 725×
State v. Underwood
Ohio Supreme Court· 2010-01-05· cited 724×
State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
State v. Miller (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-04-14· cited 71×
State v. Russell
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-04-08· cited 36×
State v. Thompson, Jr.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-24· cited 20×
State v. Perdue
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-11· cited 17×
State v. Inskeep
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-09-30· cited 10×
State v. McElroy
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-11-12· cited 9×
State v. Murphy
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-30· cited 5×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.