State v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “Florida law is clear that when the trial judge's oral pronouncement of a sentence is ambiguous, but the judge's intention is discernible from the record, the proper sentence is what the judge intended the sentence to be”
• \Harris first argued in his 3.800(a) motion that the sentence for count 5 was illegal because the trial court did not orally pronounce the sentence.... [T]he record reflects that Harris completed these sentences. This issue is thus moot.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jewel Grier v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-07-02
• Virgil Lee Harris v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2015-04-02
• Grier v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-07-02
• RODNEY ROGERS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-09-08
• James v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-12-13

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-19· cited 11×
• Miller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-16· cited 6×
• Harris v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-01-19· cited 2×