State v. Harris
Citations
- 99 Wash. 475
- 169 P. 971
- 1918 Wash. LEXIS 658
Syllabus
<p>Criminal Law—New Trial—Separation of Jury. Allowing the woman juror to occupy the judge’s chambers during intermissions, while the eleven male jurors retired to the regular jury room, does not constitute a “separation” of the jurors that was so prejudicial as to authorize a new trial, where the room remained closed and there was no communication had with the juror.</p>
Judges: Fullerton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.