Skip to main content

State v. Harris

Citations

  • 99 Wash. 475
  • 169 P. 971
  • 1918 Wash. LEXIS 658

Syllabus

<p>Criminal Law—New Trial—Separation of Jury. Allowing the woman juror to occupy the judge’s chambers during intermissions, while the eleven male jurors retired to the regular jury room, does not constitute a “separation” of the jurors that was so prejudicial as to authorize a new trial, where the room remained closed and there was no communication had with the juror.</p>

Judges: Fullerton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.