State v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he law does not permit parties to swap horses between courts in order to get a better mount in the [appellate court].” (citation and quotation marks omitted)
• “[T]he law does not permit parties to swap horses between courts in order to get a better mount in the [appellate court].” (citation and quotation marks omitted)
• “The specific grounds for objection raised before the trial court must be the theory argued on appeal because the law does not - 15 - FISH V. STETINA Opinion of the Court permit parties to swap horses between courts in order to get a better mount in the [appellate court].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Dew
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-03-17
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-12-21
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2023-06-06
• State v. Robinson
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2024-02-06
• State v. Lindsay
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2024-03-05
• State v. Maye
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2024-08-06
• State v. Velasco
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2025-02-19
• Fish v. Stetina
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2025-02-19

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Henderson v. Kibbe
  Supreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 1,629×
• United States v. Milton L. McCaskill
  Fourth Circuit· 1982-05-28· cited 433×