State v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that ORS 167.007 criminalizes an offer or agreement to engage in sexual conduct for a fee without requiring that there be any further action to carry out the offer or agreement
• “Generally, ‘[f]or purposes of establishing venue, it is sufficient that at least one essential element of a charged offense occurred in the county in question.’ ” (Quoting State v. McMillan, 199 Or App 408, 412, 111 P3d 1154 (2005
• “Generally, ‘[f]or purposes of establishing venue, it is sufficient that at least one essential element of a charged offense occurred in the county in question.’ ” (Quoting State v. McMillan, 199 Or App 408, 412, 111 P3d 1154 (2005); brackets in Harris.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Warren
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-05-02· cited 15×
• State v. Paul
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-12-03· cited 4×
• State v. Paul
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-04-22

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Cervantes
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-05-26· cited 131×
• State v. McMillan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-05-04· cited 7×
• State v. Grimes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-04-22· cited 4×
• State v. Allen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-09-30· cited 1×