State v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• after the critical postponement, the initial new trial date was 54 days beyond the expiration of the 180-day period, and the Court held that the administrative judge was not shown to have abused his discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rosenbach v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-01-06· cited 27×
• Gonzales v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-02-08· cited 25×
• State v. Toney
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-02-28· cited 20×
• State v. Cook
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-02-22· cited 17×
• State v. Dorsey
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-03-31· cited 7×
• State v. Fisher
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-03-18· cited 3×
• Wright v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-10-09· cited 3×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-12-07· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Edwards v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
• State v. Frazier
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-02-07· cited 159×
• Farinholt v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-03-15· cited 50×