State v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “There is no reason for us to accept what the affidavits say in preference to what affiants said when they testified at defendant’s trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• King v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-09-21· cited 77×
• State Ex Rel. Amrine v. Roper
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2003-04-29· cited 73×
• State v. Stanley
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-06-27· cited 61×
• State v. Downs
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1980-02-11· cited 55×
• State v. Martinez
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-09-09· cited 44×
• State v. Mooney
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1984-02-21· cited 39×
• State v. Pinkus
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1977-03-29· cited 27×
• State v. Platt
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1973-06-04· cited 22×
• Tyler v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1973-09-11· cited 18×
• Williams v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1976-04-13· cited 17×
• State v. Coffman
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1983-01-11· cited 15×
• State v. Flauaus
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1974-09-24· cited 14×
• State v. Mims
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1984-07-17· cited 12×
• State v. Triplett
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1975-01-28· cited 11×
• State v. Mooney
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1986-08-12· cited 10×
• Wilson v. ANR Freight Systems, Inc.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1995-01-26· cited 10×
• Moore v. Rollmo Corp.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1978-12-27· cited 10×
• State v. Duckett
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1993-03-17· cited 10×
• State v. Manley
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2013-09-24· cited 10×
• State v. Ziegler
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1986-11-20· cited 9×