State v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that that the court was required to draw a distinction between two kinds of theft because \such a distinction was drawn by\ the English courts and incorporated into the Oregon statutes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Medina
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2015-05-14· cited 21×
• State v. Robertson
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1977-04-26· cited 12×
• State v. Doster
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1967-05-10· cited 11×
• State v. Lewis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1967-11-15· cited 5×
• State v. Needham
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1971-05-13

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Keys
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1966-11-10· cited 35×
• State v. Tauscher
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1961-04-12· cited 31×
• State v. Thompson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1965-05-26· cited 8×